WALTHAM, Mass., Aug. 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Salary.com, the global leader in compensation data, software, and AI, today released the 2026 Trust and Pay Report, new research putting parallel questions to 1,051 employers and 975 employees on pay fairness, transparency, and trust. The report's central finding is a correlation between pay fairness perception and employee trust. Employees who rate their pay as unfair are more than five times as likely to say their trust in their employer has declined over the past year (36.4%) as employees who feel fairly paid (6.6%).
The pattern is not a quirk of this sample. The relationship holds across the full trust scale, not just at the extremes. It is highly significant statistically with a moderate effect size, meaning this is both a real, non-random pattern and a substantial one rather than a technically significant but trivial effect. Salary.com presents the finding as a strong association rather than a causal claim.
How Closely Fairness and Trust Track
“Pay fairness and trust are not two separate, unrelated programs. Our latest research shows they are part of the same conversation,” said Amy Dwyer, CHRO at Salary.com. “That connection is easy to miss right now. Quits are at a multi-year low, retention numbers look strong, and a quiet labor market can easily be mistaken for employee loyalty. But employees who perceive their pay as unfair are already losing trust. When hiring picks back up, they may be the first to walk. Building trust in pay fairness takes time and consistent effort, which is why the time to address it is now, while the market is still quiet.”
Employers Are In The Dark
The report finds employers largely unable to say which way trust is moving, which makes the fairness link difficult to act on.
Employers Are Misreading How Employees Experience Pay Fairness
The report reveals that employers are misreading where employees actually sit when it comes to their perceptions of pay fairness.
Two Levers That Do Not Require Raising Payroll
For organizations already paying competitively, the data points to two places where fairness perception moves without additional spend.
“Most organizations I talk to are not underpaying people on purpose, and plenty of them cannot move payroll much at all right now,” said Dwyer. “That shouldn’t be the end of the conversation. Employees rate fairness on what they can see and what someone can explain to them. If a manager cannot answer why your pay looks the way it does, the employee fills in the blank, and they rarely fill it in generously.”
The Quiet Market Is a Phase, Not a Permanent State
According to BLS JOLTS data, the quits rate fell to 1.9% in May 2026, down from a peak of roughly 2.8% in 2022 and its lowest level outside the initial 2020 pandemic shock. Combined with a hires rate of 3.3% and layoffs and discharges holding at 1.1%, the data points to a genuine low-hire, low-fire equilibrium: not a sudden freeze, but a steady multi-year cooling. The report argues that what organizations do during this window will determine their footing when it ends.
“The mistake is treating a quiet labor market as a safe one,” said Dwyer. “The market is holding its breath. The organizations that use this window to improve trust and pay fairness will be in better positioned when it exhales.”
The full 2026 Trust and Pay Report is available for download. A companion report examining how AI is reshaping employee experience, skill requirements, and workload will follow.
About the Survey
The 2026 Trust and Pay Report is based primarily on Salary.com's Workplace Program Practices Survey, a paired study fielded in June 2026 via third-party research panel Dynata, with 1,051 employer respondents and 975 employee respondents. Employer and employee respondents are independent samples answering parallel versions of the same questions, not matched pairs at the individual or organization level. All comparisons are between group-level distributions rather than within-person or within-organization pairs.
The relationship between pay fairness perception and trust was tested against respondent-level data. It is statistically significant (chi-square, p<0.0001) with a moderate effect size (Cramer's V = 0.366). Salary.com reports the finding as an association rather than a causal claim.
The manager training comparison cited above (69.2% and 51.6%) comes from a separate instrument, Salary.com's annual Pay Practices and Compensation Strategy Survey, which collects responses from HR and compensation professionals only.
Labor market context is drawn from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, news release USDL-26-1123, released June 30, 2026.
About Salary.com
Founded in 1999, Salary.com helps organizations get pay right with a complete approach to compensation management. Built on a proprietary job ontology, Salary.com delivers AI software, data, and services that enable companies to define roles, benchmark jobs, manage pay structures, and make pay decisions built to last. More than 10,000 customers worldwide trust Salary.com, with insights powered by over 30,000 organizations across 140+ countries and spanning more than 1.4 million leveled job titles.
Combining pragmatic innovation in artificial intelligence with deep human expertise, Salary.com helps organizations make precise pay decisions, build trust with employees, and compete in a changing world. For more information, visit www.salary.com.
Media Contact: pr@salary.com